Message 00171 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00171 Message: 1/2 L0 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

[jox] Reviewer for 'pschological' papers

Hi all, 

On 2009-11-22 Mathieu O'Neil wrote:
Hi Stefan


Re your questions: I don't think there are any restrictions as to who
can join the list. Regarding adding people to the Scientific Committee my
position as stated previously is that people on the SC are claiming to
speak with authority about a certain field and that this should be
verified by a link to a page establishing their "credentials" or
archiving / listing their writings and thoughts about the subject in
which they are claiming expert status. If the person you are supporting
fits either of those criteria then there is no problem from my
perspective. I did do a rapid google search on that name and came up
with nothing but since
a) there is no clear consensus about membership criteria yet and
b) I'm not sure that it's part of my "job description" to perfom such
searches to verify whether someone is qualified or not,
I did not pursue this.

You would not have found anything of interest anyway. As Stefan mentioned I'm planning to write my diploma thesis next year. So far I have only done my 'regular' studies Though that ist not supposed to say that I'm studying ordinarily unfortunately I have no substantial writings which I could display nor do I have an own page. I guess I'll have to wait until after my diploma thesis - or else let me know. Who knows, maybe you'll still be looking for a reviewer for the psychological field when I've finished my studies...

all the best, 

GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter


Thread: joxT00171 Message: 1/2 L0 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00171 [Homepage] [Navigation]