Message 00196 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00189 Message: 2/77 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: Fwd: Re: [jox] Multi-rating mode of evaluation (was: Multi-rating mode of evaluation / Updating papers)

On Thursday, 3. December 2009, Mathieu O'Neil wrote:
Personally I can only devote so much time to this project, in addition
 to work and family commitments...

:) me too!

This also raises the question of imposing the reviewer or editor's views
 in order to publish: authors may not agree with the reviewers but in
 traditional journals have no choice but to accept their opinion or risk
 non-publication (btw there was a paper written by a swiss economist a
 few years ago along those lines: "Academic publishing as a form of
 prostitution", or something).

I would imagine that we have a somewhat more collegial way of dealing with 

Finally: do you then disapprove also of reader ratings?

No, not at all, but I would keep it really simple. Otherwise it won't be 



--- ----------------------------- out now:
*|Mediale Kunst/Media Arts Zurich.13 Positions.Scheidegger&Spiess2008
*|Manuel Castells and the Theory of the Network Society. Polity, 2006 
*|Open Cultures and the Nature of Networks. Ed. Futura/Revolver, 2005 

Thread: joxT00189 Message: 2/77 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00196 [Homepage] [Navigation]