Message 00845 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00841 Message: 5/22 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] Request for information - non-peer reviewed content

I agree,
Actually the unity and difference between knowledge workers who perform universal labor and other workers is both the main resource for the movement and is its main fault line at the same time. Lenin and Kautsky argued that the working class needed bourggeosie intellectuals who adpoted the ideological stance of the working class to theorize and universalize the goals of working class revolution. Whether this theory was correct in the past is a matter of debate. Today, the very fact that a considerable section of working class, namely, knowledge workers perform cognitive work, make the class self sufficient in term of intellectual resources. But we need to fight hard in order to nuietralize the influence of information capitalism among knowledge workerss. It would not be an exageration to say that in this stage the winning of knowledge workers over the cause of communism is the most important task of the movement. And indeed, there are already very good news on this front, P2P debates and pubications, occupy wall street, indignado, wikiliks, anonzmous.... But, there is no place for complacency, because, if the informational capitalism will succeed in corrupting knowledge workers then the cause of communism will be posponed for decades.
cheers
Jakob

02/24/12 5:04 PM >>> 

Hi Jakob, Michel and all, 

Since personally i think this discussion is touching the key issue for 
instance the possible solidarity between movements so building up 
widest 'counter heand difference gemonic historic orgnet', it would worth to 
continue. It is featured on my blog. When your contribution is ready 
Michel would be good to add here too. It can also be added on the p2p 
- Marxism discussion? 

best, 
orsan 




Citeren Michel Bauwens : 


are you on any social network where it could be linked and where you could 
react? 

Orsan in cc already copied the debate on his blog, 

Michel 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Jakob Rigi wrote: 


Thanks a lot michel. 
Jakob 


Michel Bauwens **02/23/12 11:01 PM >>> 


Dear Jakob, I have not seen your contribution on the p2p blog, but I have 
reposted it, along with a response of mine, to our Ning Forum, 
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profiles/blogs/is-facebook-exploiting-workers-a-response-from-jacob-rigi, 
and already tweeted/facebooked it with cc to Stephen. 

I'm also asking Franco to repost this dialogue to our regular blog whidh 
gets more traction, (thanks Franco, any day with less than four 
contributions is good, earlier better than later!) 

I'm going to discuss this controversy on al jazeera (writing this weekend, 
they asked me for contributions but i have as yet offered them anything) 

Michel 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Jakob Rigi wrote: 


Hello Michel, 
I wrote a critical response to Land's and Bohm's short essay on 
facebook. I tried to post on p2p foundation, but I am not sure that it went 
through. It is just one page but it propose a major thesis. I attached it 
here. I will be grateful if you will post it if my own effort to post it 
was not successful. 
Meanwhile, I will be great if you, and you Orsan and Mathieu too, respond 
to it. I want to know your points of views. 
all the best 
Jakob Rigi 


Michel Bauwens 11/04/11 3:19 AM >>> 

[Converted from multipart/alternative] 

[1 text/plain] 
I have a 10 day period after nov 6 to write this!! 

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Mathieu ONeil 
wrote: 



[Converted from multipart/alternative] 

[1 text/plain] 
Hi all 

In addition to the Debate section by Meretz et al, (hi Maurizio!) the 
following people agreed to write short contributions to the next 

general 

issue on peer production, to be released in December: 

-Michel Bauwens 
-Christian Siefkes 

I have not heard anything from them so far - how goes it? 

In addition Andreas Wittel volunteered to do a review of a recent 
Christian Fuchs book - would it be possible to know how that is going? 

Finally an SC member agreed to provide informal advice on a short 
contribution on Bitcoin - any news on that would be much 

appreciated...? 


cheers, 

Mathieu 




[2 text/html] 
______________________________ 
http://www.oekonux.org/journal 





-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: 
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation 

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; 
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens 


[2 text/html] 
______________________________ 
http://www.oekonux.org/journal 





-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: 
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation 

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; 
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens 





-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: 
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation 

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; 
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
Thread: joxT00841 Message: 5/22 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00845 [Homepage] [Navigation]