Message 01155 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT01155 Message: 1/1 L0 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

[ox-en] [Fwd: <nettime> Red Hat Fires Back]




Hi
I am new to the list ... I just recieved this from nettime. Stefan crticqued a paper of mine a little while back where I discussed som Australian Aboriginal art copyright cases and their relationship to OSS. He was right in his criticisms of my then understanding of OSS (three hail marys as penance) but I have been rethinking my approach and realise that the SCO debate is a better example of the analogy I sought to draw. In the Aboriginal example the "traditional owners" of a design are able to bring a case to restarin athird party or another traditional owner if a ceratin use undermines the integrity of the communla project. It is not an action based in property but equity and the notion of a fiduciary relationship. My developing argument is that this approach better reflects the practice of OSS than does a property/licence based approach. The posting below is an example of where it could be used ... eg a Red hat user could seek a decalaration based upon their equitable interst in red hat or better still a general linux user (not code developer-copyright owner): anyway I thought for my initail appearance here on the lsit I would just pass this on...don't want to gte too carried away just yet
regargs
Martin
Euskadi and Mozambique

Reposted from the excellent commons-law mailing list maintained by Sarai
(original post by Sunil Abraham)
-----------------------------------

http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/08/04/1813224.shtml?tid=23
Monday August 04, 2003 - [ 06:09 PM GMT ] Topic - GNU/Linux

- by Joe Barr -

Red Hat announced today a two-pronged attack against the SCO Group. Red
Hat filed a claim for two declaratory judgements: that they had not
infringed on SCO's copyright material and that they didn't
misappropriate SCO trade secrets. The complaint also seeks a permanent
injunction against SCO for their "campaign" against Linux and Linux
customers.

Red Hat also announced a one milliar (million? PR) dollar donation to a
fund for the defense of open source developers against open source
developers for infringement and invited other companies to follow suit.

Red Hat came out swinging in the 27 page complaint filed in the U. S.
District Court in Delaware against The SCO Group. The opening sentence
of the complaint states that Red Hat "has commenced this action in
response to the unfair, untrue and deceptive campaign now being waged by
the defendent, The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), to harm the market for Red
Hat's highly successful operating system based on the open source LINUX
kernel."

In addition to asking for declaratory judgement of two items (that Red
Hat did not infringe upon SCO's copyrights or misappropriate SCO's trade
secrets), the complaint asks "damages, trebled, as well as injunctive
relief, attorneys' fees and costs, for harm caused by SCO's unfair
competition and false advertising in violation of Section 43(a) of the
Lanham Act... unfair and deceptive acts or practices in violation of the
Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act... as well as for violations of
common law, including trade libel, unfair competition, and tortious
interference with prospective economic advantage".

In the press conference announcing the suit held this morning at the
Linux World Conference and Expo being held in San Francisco, a Red Hat
spokesman said the aim of the suit "is to help our customers. Customers
were brought into this process and received threatening letters from
SCO. Customers have been threatened and extorted that if they don't ante
up X amount of money, they will face legal consequences." Shares in The
SCO Group fell over two dollars on the news, but have rebounded slightly
and are now trading at $11.32 a share, down from its high for the day of
$13.75.

_______________________________________________
commons-law mailing list
commons-law mail.sarai.net
http://mail.sarai.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/commons-law

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime bbs.thing.net





_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/



Thread: oxenT01155 Message: 1/1 L0 [In index]
Message 01155 [Homepage] [Navigation]