Message 03992 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT03957 Message: 7/26 L4 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
On 2007-11-28 20:25, graham wrote:
I now see instead that it is so poisonous that it is rejected before it is swallowed. Unless it has a fully capitalist form (eg. produced by IBM employees for wages and distributed with their equipment, in IBMs original commercial model from the 60s) it disrupts capitalism too much. IT managers' power depends too much on the money they spend, on the contacts they have exclusively with particular companies, for them to accept it. It blocks the flow of capital and power within the firm, and within government departments.
I don't understand what the poison is and how it works. Blocking the flow of capital? Where does a commercial OS approach blocks capital? I share your observations, but I want to understand, what is happing there, and I don't. Could you explain? Ciao, Stefan -- Start here: www.meretz.de _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT03957 Message: 7/26 L4 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 03992 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |