Message 04241 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT03726 Message: 31/35 L7 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

[ox-en] Re: [ox-en] Re: Superior results? (was: Re: [ox-en] Free Software and social move





On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:31:43 [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED], "Franz Nahrada" <f.nahrada reflex.at>
wrote:

Capitalism was favored as mode of production
because it was an efficient wealth - creating mechanism, which equals
accumulation of abstract wealth, gold.

[...]

We all agree that exactly in this situation of an external "womb" aka
commons-friendly capitalism there is an amazing potential for this class
to further organize and gain real independence and strength. Only the
"how" seems to be contested.

I have no clue what "Capitalism" is intended to mean here. "Capitalism"
does not
mean "Industrialism" nor "Exchange" nor "Markets" nor "Specialization of
Labour."

Capitalism means that owners of Capital appropriate the product of Labour,
that, on it's
own is not an efficient mode of production.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/hodgskin/labour-defended.htm







_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de



Thread: oxenT03726 Message: 31/35 L7 [In index]
Message 04241 [Homepage] [Navigation]