Message 04893 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 25/166 L13 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Hi Christian and all! Last month (47 days ago) Christian Siefkes wrote:
[1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-15 (quoted-printable)>] H, CTVN, CTVN wrote:what do you do if demand for unpopular, repetetive, boring tasks (like cleaning or most of the typical manufacturing tasks) exceeds supply of people willing to do the task on a reliable, lasting basis? dropping all "excessive" projects until demand meets supply for the specific task doesnt seem like a reasonable solution.they are "weighted higher", i.e. if you decide to perform an unpopular task, you have to do less of it than when you perform a popular task. Read the book.
This is indeed one point in the book which I simply do not understand: In which way this is any different from a simply labor market? You are paid higher wages for tasks for which there are less people available. However, the labor market is true to reality in that not everyone is able to do any job and so the supply side is part of the weight. But I see no way to prevent that in a system based on abstract labor like you are proposing. Grüße Stefan _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 25/166 L13 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 04893 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |