Message 00260 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00250 Message: 7/10 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

[jox] Signals _and_ Accept/Reject

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi George, all

The hermit awakes! Will sparks fly as they did a year ago? ;-)

@ Brian Whitworth: Brian, what do you think about the below idea: allowing people to choose between signals (used to be 'ratings') and plain accepted/rejected articles? Would this introduces a dissonance in the system and an unwanted division in the articles? Or would it be OK, in your view?
Thanks for advising,


2. Regarding the *submission process*: although this might complicate
things a bit in the beginning (for both editorial team and potential
contributing authors), i agree with the idea of letting submitting
authors decide whether they prefer their submissions to be evaluated
according to the accept/reject model or based on 'signals'.



Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]

[2 text/html]

Thread: joxT00250 Message: 7/10 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00260 [Homepage] [Navigation]