Re: [jox] Licence for articles
- From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:32:43 +0200
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
On 2011-06-06 21:44, Stefan Merten wrote:
Of course I welcome Mathieu's choice. Still...
1 hours ago Athina Karatzogianni wrote:
As I understand it we are getting into nuisances over licensing
here within the peer producing paradigm, shall we leave this
future issue to discuss and come to an agreement what to do with
is in a practical manner instead?
...I think it is a good idea to make this the main topic of an
I also think that this is a good idea. However the problem is that to have a whole special issue - with formal CFP etc - it would be good to have a legal specialist on board; if you remember, we failed to find someone last year. I approached L. Liang at the CPOV conference in Amsterdam but he never got back to me.
So what I was thinking is: maybe this would be a perfect topic for a Debate of strongly contrasted positions with an initial sub by the BY-SA position and a response by the NC position (or vice-versa)? Then there could be rejoinders? That way the papers can be shorter, don't need to be peer reviewed, and can really respond to the other position?
Anyone up for this?