Issue / debate about licenses (was: Re: [jox] Licence for articles)

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:39:16 +0200

Hi all!

Today Mathieu ONeil wrote:

On 2011-06-06 21:44, Stefan Merten wrote:

...I think it is a good idea to make this the main topic of an 

issue.
+1

SMz

 I also think that this is a good idea. However the problem is that to have a whole special issue - with formal CFP etc - it would be good to have a legal specialist on board;

I don't think that much special legal knowledge is necessary for this.

So what I was thinking is: maybe this would be a perfect topic for a Debate of strongly contrasted positions with an initial sub by the BY-SA position and a response by the NC position (or vice-versa)? Then there could be rejoinders? That way the papers can be shorter, don't need to be peer reviewed, and can really respond to the other position?

Of course this is an option. May be this can be a precursor for an
issue.


						Grüße

						Stefan

• References:
  • [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Athina Karatzogianni
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Stefan Meretz
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
• First in thread: [jox] Licence for articles
• Last in thread: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
• Previous thread: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
• Next thread: [jox] Identity of reviewers
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Licence for articles