Message 01816 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT01363 Message: 35/59 L12 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: SpamAssassin and OHA (was: [ox-en] SpamAssassin (was: OHA/ODA in English))



you might always have rebels but control is pretty effective
I will trya nd find you some references.
But galloways Protocol How Controls exists ...a nd Deleuze's Postscript on 
Control Societies are good. they build on Disciline and Punishment 

Dont talk to me about gift economies anymore today I am trying to edit 
something and I will just get angry and distracted!! :-)

aha found it ......
here in a footnote in he thing I am working on:

Deleuze, Gilles Deleuze, "Postscript on the Societies of Control", from 
OCTOBER 59, Winter 1992, MIT Press, pages 3-7, available at: 
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9512/msg00012.html;  
Alex Galloway, Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization, 
Rethinking Marxism, Volume 13, No. 3 pages 81 -- 88 
I have this at http://openflows.org/~auskadi/protocol.pdf
; and Control and Becoming, An interview with Gilles Deleuze by Antonio Negri,  
	http://www.generation-online.org/p/fpdeleuze3.htm 


On Monday 15 December 2003 16:36, Graham Seaman wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Martin Hardie wrote:
On Monday 15 December 2003 15:33, Graham Seaman wrote:
In other words, you would replace censorship with self-censorship and
external discipline with internal discipline...

sounds like Foucault/ Deleuze: from societies of discipline to societies
of control

I never read anything by Deleuze, and the only relevant thing from
Foucault I've read is Discipline and Punish - but going by that, the
impression I have is that they associate this kind of internal control
with capitalism. To me it seems that internal control in 'normal'
capitalism (as opposed to fascist dictatorships, or ex 'really existing
socialism') is not that successful: you can always find rebels, just
because lots of things still are controlled by rules, and not internal.
Where it is really successful is in small scale societies, villages where
life tends to be shared, the antithesis of capitalism, gift economies
even.. The kind of society where gossip rules (and fear of being gossiped
about creates the internal controls). The kind of society where people
might end up commenting 'hmm.. you know her, SHE hasn't written much free
software lately... in danger of being alienated from the group she is'
(oops.. slipped into Yodaese)

Graham

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

-- 
                   
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
http://openflows.org/~auskadi/

"Mind you, I am not asking you to bear witness to what you believe false, 
which would be a sin, but to testify falsely to what you believe true - which 
is a virtuous act because it compensates for lack of proof of something 
that certainly exists or happened." Bishop Otto to Baudolino in Umberto Eco's 
Baudolino.

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/



Thread: oxenT01363 Message: 35/59 L12 [In index]
Message 01816 [Homepage] [Navigation]