Re: [ox-en] Peer-to-peer Electricity and p2p theory

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:58:37 +0200

Hi!

6 days ago martin hardie wrote:

the problem with oekenux theory is that you are not allowed to talk
about the  system-confirming aspects of P2P production.

Actually the contrary is true. For instance please check

	http://www.oekonux.org/introduction/blotter/default_15.html

or better

	http://www.oekonux.org/introduction/blotter/default_16.html

The germ form idea being probably one of the central Oekonux ideas
says that the germ form needs to be embedded in the old. As such it is
a simple necessity for the germ form that it has system-confirming
aspects - otherwise it could not be embedded.

In fact some critics of Oekonux theory argue that if there are
system-confirming aspects in something it can not be
system-transcending at the same time. These critics are probably
looking for something in outer space to transcend the system on earth.

You can read even this:

	http://www.oekonux.org/introduction/blotter/default_17.html


						Mit Freien Grüßen

						Stefan

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] Peer-to-peer Electricity and p2p theory
    • From: martin hardie

• Next in thread: [ox-en] FreeModes, was Re:Peer-to-peer Electricity and p2p theory
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Peer-to-peer Electricity and p2p theory
• First in thread: [ox-en] Peer-to-peer Electricity
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Peer-to-peer Electricity
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Dangerous changes in the GPL 3.0
• Next thread: [ox-en] Re: Open for donations (was Re: gEDA-user: Languages etc)
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] FreeModes
• Prev by Date: [ox-en] getting online representation going to support meaningful work