Message 03291 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT03289 Message: 3/4 L1 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] walking over the pre-alpha bridge



On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Thomas Berker wrote:
Being inherently iterative and incremental F/LOSS development definitely does not adhere to correctness on every 'step of software development'

The paper you refer to seems stuck in the ISO9000 mindset of development which is focused laser-like on process and almost zero on content. It is the idea that quality control first and foremost must exist in the production stage. Correct process leads to correct result.

This kind of thinking is crucial for example in empirical science, where how you conduct your studies is more important than your results, because if your process is flawed (eg test results are contaminated), your results are irrelevant, even if in the end the conclusion turns out to be true.

However, open source software and open design is more like theoretical science, where process is irrelevant and ability to indepedently verify or falsify the final result is everything. When a fault is discovered or thought likely, one does not question the process that created the program, but one reads its source code. This is even more the case when functional approaches are used, which more resemble theoretical work than iterative languages do.

Do we want to use a GPLed bridge which - no problem here - in a few months or years will be wonderfully stable, but which was 'released early'?
...
if we need to abandon some of the corner stones of F/LOSS development in exactly those sectors, which 'just have to work', this would would render it a rather weak 'germ' for a new society, wouldn't it?

Some things must have a rigid process and cannot "release early" or seek help of "a thousand eyeballs". This usually goes for construction, medicine, empirical studies, and so on. However, even these are based on software, designs and theories that would only be improved by openness and freedom.

  - Per
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de



Thread: oxenT03289 Message: 3/4 L1 [In index]
Message 03291 [Homepage] [Navigation]