Message 04668 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 20/166 L10 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Patrick Anderson writes:
I can't seem to get an answer to the following questions: Are you saying that there will be no trading of goods or of labor? Will specialization be allowed? If not, must we each be our own dentist?
Its interesting that many cultural codes have emerged in history for specialisation that had nothing to do with markets. In fact there should be a mininum requirement for a consensus that he or she who wants to do away with markets does NOT imply that labor should nbot be divided. As we used to say in our happy university days: The market has no problem not do divide the labour. One intrinsic failure of market systems is to disfavor meaningful specialisation because of uncertain outcomes. If its profitable, too many farmers switch to produce pigs (the famous "pig - cycle"). And thousands of companies are running for the same goal, reinventing the wheel 800 times. The fiberoptic abundance in cities - market failure, all are doing the same instead of specializing. Franz _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 20/166 L10 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 04668 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |