Re: [ox-en] Re: The Future of Un-Money // was "Re: There IS such a thing as peer money"
- From: "marc fawzi" <marc.fawzi gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:59:59 -0800
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
<<
There is a category error here. Money is not energy
Money is definitely not energy in the current economic model and it's
*potential* energy in the context of a thermoeconomic model. What I mean is,
in the thermoeconomic model, money is treated as potential energy.
So you're right in that it is not energy. But it is treated as potential
energy in the thermoeconomic model.
<<
But one can not be substituted for another.
While money is potential energy in the thermoeconomic model it is not
treated as potential energy in the current model which is based on human
behavior rather than nature's behavior. So in order for the current model
(which will not disappear overnight) and the thermoeconomic model to work
together there must be two kinds of flows: the flow of potential energy in
the thermoeconomic layer as tokenized energy (virtual tokens) and the flow
of money (as it is today) in the existing layer combined with giving people
the ability to direct both flows using the affinity matrix concept.
[2 application/ms-tnef]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de
[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de