Message 00079 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: joxT00000 Message: 57/176 L16 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] Hi Mathieu and all,
Yes. It is true that "based" and "oriented" may encompass each other, but they may not. "commons based and oriented" sounds fine.But I think it would be useful to be more specific and integrate both ideas by writing: “commons- based **and** commons-oriented production”. That might seem redundant, but “based” may mean that only the input is “common”. “Commons-oriented” makes more explicit that the output is also “common”.OK, well I see your point but stylistically it is a bit heavy to have both in my view. Whichever one encompasses the other could be put in - or alternatively a formulation like "commons-based and oriented"?
Raoul [2 text/html] ______________________________ http://www.oekonux.org/journal
Thread: joxT00000 Message: 57/176 L16 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
---|---|---|---|
Message 00079 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |