Message 00109 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00000 Message: 42/176 L21 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] Re: Example journal sites

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi Stefan

"Misleading" seems to say there is the intent to deceive people, which was not my intent. In the end the information is the same its just the presentation which differs. Personally I would rather have one place to check all comments - more convenient - however there is perhaps the option of having both - comments on each article and also aggregated?


From: Stefan Meretz <stefan>
Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009 4:29 pm

On 2009-08-28 17:14, Stefan Merten wrote:
3 days ago Mathieu O'Neil wrote:
OK, my point is also that if you have one page for all comments
then it looks better than having 3/4 of the pages empty because
no-one has commented on these articles - I could be wrong.

Valid point. Of course a central comment page {sh,c}ould have links
to the respective articles but that's doable.

This would be very unusual and misleading for the readers. If 
see no 
problem having articles with no comments. We don't need looking-
fakes -- IMHO.


Start here:


Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University

E-mail: mathieu.oneil
Tel.: (61 02) 61 25 38 00
Mail: Coombs Building, 9
Canberra, ACT 0200 - AUSTRALIA

[2 text/html]

Thread: joxT00000 Message: 42/176 L21 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00109 [Homepage] [Navigation]