Making offline decisions (was: SV: [jox] Hull Meeting)

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:20:11 +0200

Hi Johan!

Last week (9 days ago) Johan Söderberg wrote:

That might not be such a bad idéa. In the end, it is not a panel we need but to find the occasion to sit down together and discuss for a longer period of time about the journal and take decisions.

I think we should stick to make decisions online. It's fine to prepare
decisions during an offline meeting - and it's great to meet you all
:-) - but final decisions should be made here IMHO. Otherwise you have
a split between people travelling a lot and those who contribute only
online.


						Grüße

						Stefan

• References:
  • Fwd: Re: [jox] Multi-rating mode of evaluation (was: Multi-rating mode of evaluation / Updating papers)
    • From: Mathieu O&#039;Neil
  • RE: Re: [jox] Multi-rating mode of evaluation (was: Multi-rating mode of evaluation / Updating papers)
    • From: Wittel, Andreas
  • [jox] Cutting the Knot
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Cutting the Knot
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • Re: [jox] Cutting the Knot
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Cutting the Knot
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • [jox] Hull Meeting
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Hull Meeting
    • From: Alex Halavais
  • SV: [jox] Hull Meeting
    • From: Johan Söderberg

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] Hull Meeting
• Previous in thread: SV: [jox] Hull Meeting
• First in thread: Fwd: Re: [jox] Multi-rating mode of evaluation (was: Multi-rating mode of evaluation / Updating papers)
• Last in thread: Declaration of Hull? (was: Re: [jox] Hull Meeting)
• Previous thread: [jox] Reviewer for psychological aspects in peer production
• Next thread: [jox] Mail tests
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] Plone
• Prev by Date: Declaration of Hull? (was: Re: [jox] Hull Meeting)