Message 00518 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00515 Message: 29/32 L2 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] Licence for articles

BY-NC-SA is the best one if we want people to be able to publish remixed versions

The whole lot of the CC licenses are at the bottom:

I am not so worried that others will make a buck from our pieces, at
all, frankly :-) but you never know. There are some interesting choices
to be made about derivatives and such. In this case I am a fan of the
least restrictive ones.

All best,

On 06/02/2011 06:02 AM, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi everyone

I am finalising the layout of the pdf versions of the articles and was wondering if there were any thoughts as to what the best [anti]copyright licence would be? Do we need one at all? I would say yes to stop anyone commercialising the papers (unlikely, but you never know). So what is the most useful - CC? I don't know much about this so any advice most welcome.


[2 text/html]

Gabriella Coleman, Assistant Professor
NYU, Department of Media, Culture, & Communication
On Leave 2010-2011, The Institute for Advanced Study

Alessandro Delfanti
ICS, Innovations in the Communication of Science
Sissa, Trieste, Italy

  SISSA Webmail
  Powered by Horde


Thread: joxT00515 Message: 29/32 L2 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00518 [Homepage] [Navigation]