Message 00523 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00515 Message: 6/32 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

SV: [jox] Licence for articles

Guess I have the tiping vote!

As was already noted before, there is no practical significance to this choice. As with 98% of all CC licensed goods, It is all about self-promotion and sending the right signals. The ideological purist signal that we want to send is to ditch the non-commercial. 


Från: owner-journal [owner-journal] för Mathieu ONeil [mathieu.oneil]
Skickat: den 2 juni 2011 18:33
Till: journal
Ämne: Re: [jox] Licence for articles

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi all

Um, crossed messages! OK, we have 2:2. I can see both sides.
Sending the strongest message about NC vs. favouring the spread of the licence... I guess we need more input?



----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten>
Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011 6:22 pm
Subject: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
To: journal

Hi all!

2 hours ago Alex Halavais wrote:
I would make the argument for CC-BY-SA.


NC is an anti-pattern for me. Free Software would not have been
possible with NC - so what should it be good for?



Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]

[2 text/html]

Thread: joxT00515 Message: 6/32 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00523 [Homepage] [Navigation]