Guess I have the tiping vote!
As was already noted before, there is no practical significance
to this choice. As with 98% of all CC licensed goods, It is all
about self-promotion and sending the right signals. The
ideological purist signal that we want to send is to ditch the
non-commercial.
Hence: CC: BY-SA +1
Johan
________________________________________
Från: owner-journal oekonux.org [owner-journal oekonux.org]
för Mathieu ONeil [mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au]
Skickat: den 2 juni 2011 18:33
Till: journal oekonux.org
Ämne: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi all
Um, crossed messages! OK, we have 2:2. I can see both sides.
Sending the strongest message about NC vs. favouring the spread
of the licence... I guess we need more input?
cheers
Mathieu
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011 6:22 pm
Subject: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
To: journal oekonux.org
Hi all!
2 hours ago Alex Halavais wrote:
I would make the argument for CC-BY-SA.
+1
NC is an anti-pattern for me. Free Software would not have been
possible with NC - so what should it be good for?
Grüße
Stefan
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal