Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule

• From: Rich Walker <rw shadow.org.uk>
• Date: 23 Dec 2003 00:55:47 +0000

Benj. Mako Hill:

IMHO, these are much more serious accuasations and AFAIK he has not
answered these anywhere.

And given that this is the man who re-branded Free Software for the
pleasure of our Corporate Overlords, are we surprised?

cheers, Rich

[Hey, we'll be *nice* corporate overlords... I'd make a *great*
benevolent dictator - and you'd better agree]

-- 
rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | rw shadow.org.uk
front-of-tshirt space to let     251 Liverpool Road   |
                                 London  N1 1LX       | +UK 20 7700 2487
_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• References:
  • [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
    • From: Martin Hardie
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
    • From: Graham Seaman
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
    • From: Benj. Mako Hill

• Next in thread: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
• First in thread: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
• Last in thread: Re: [politics] Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Free as in America
• Next thread: [ox-en] Peace on earth
• Next by Date: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA (was: [ox-en] SpamAssassin (was: OHA/ODA in English))
• Prev by Date: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA (was: [ox-en] SpamAssassin (was: OHA/ODA in English))