| Message 05084 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 97/166 L25 | [In index] | ||
| [First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
| [Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/mixed] [1 text/plain]
What about development of productive forces? Using machines, computers, levels of cooperation? What about tacit knowledge? Affective labour? And so on...Why does this enter into the question, could you explain a bit more what you are thinking?
Because there is not only training, that transforms "simple labour" into "complex labour", but also the aspects I mentioned above. Take a worker in a manufactory doing some manual operations. Take the same worker and put him into an industrialized factory doing the same operations with a thousand times bigger output. Skill does not play any role in this example, but development of productive forces (my first point). ------------------------------------------- But why is this relevant to the question of simple versus complex labour. This is a different issue, that with technical advances less labour is socially necessary. This was well understood by all the classicals. [2 application/ms-tnef] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
| Thread: oxenT04643 Message: 97/166 L25 | [In index] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Message 05084 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |