Re: [jox] peer review
- From: Athina Karatzogianni <athina.k gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:31:06 +0000
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Call me a nutcase, but my personal stance is any paper well-researched and
reasonably referencend and argued is worth publishing whatever the
background and ideology of the author or the reviewer. Perhaps my belief
that most reviewers would be in that category is misplaced, but I d like to
believe that peer review ultimately works better than asking 200 people from
the street to vote on it .
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:48 PM, graham <graham theseamans.net> wrote:
Questioning traditional peer review:
http://cameronneylon.net/blog/peer-review-what-is-it-good-for/
Graham
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
--
Dr Athina Karatzogianni
Lecturer in Media, Culture and Society
The Dean's Representative (Chinese Partnerships)
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
The University of Hull
United Kingdom
HU6 7RX
T: ++44 (0) 1482 46 5790
F: ++44 (0) 1482 466107
http://www2.hull.ac.uk/FASS/humanities/media,_culture_and_society/staff/karatzogianni,_dr_athina.aspx
Check out Athina's work
http://browse.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?ath=A+Karatzogianni
Check Virtual Communication Collaboration and Conflict (Virt3C) Conference
Call
http://virt3c.wordpress.com/
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal