Re: Published? (was: Re: [jox] texts for peer review added)
- From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:37:08 +0200
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
Hi Stefan, all
I had a quick look and some have been put in archives etc. I will have a more systematic look and see how to characterise these texts.
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Monday, April 19, 2010 8:52 pm
Subject: Published? (was: Re: [jox] texts for peer review added)
To: journal oekonux.org
Hi Mathieu and all!
6 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:
Also, have some of these texts been published anywhere?
I agree this is a question we should at least know how to deal with.
But what does published mean? Is simply putting a text on the web
publishing in this sense? For me this would be counterproductive
since we want people to tell about their stuff and not keep it secret.
Then we need a notion of "qualified publication". An criterion could
be: Has it been published after a peer review process?
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University