Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 13:20:49 +0200

Hi Mathieu!

5 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:

Here are my suggestions for the conference report questions. 

May be I'm missing something but as far as I can see you didn't tell
us what you have in mind with such conference reports. In other mails
you were also talking of a extra section for this. Can you please
enlighten me on your thoughts? Who should be entitled to fill out such
reports?


						Grüße

						Stefan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• References:
  • [jox] reviewing in practice
    • From: Athina Karatzogianni
  • Re: [jox] reviewing in practice
    • From: Maurizio Teli
  • [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
• Previous in thread: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
• First in thread: [jox] reviewing in practice
• Last in thread: [jox] Searchable mailing list archive (was: Re: Documenting current state)
• Previous thread: [jox] Fwd: CFP - Symposium on Peer Reviewing
• Next thread: [jox] Short site stop
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] HOWTO_peer review
• Prev by Date: Documenting current state (was: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports)