Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
- From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
- Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 22:43:19 +0200
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi Stefan, all
The idea is just to give organisers of conferences a chance to reflect and communicate on their experience - anyone who organised a conference dealing with peer production issues would be welcome to do it. If you wanted to, you could do one about last year's Oekonux conference for example, though I think stretching back more than one year in the past might be a bit stale.
Having standardised questions and overall length will help to keep the section nice and compact as well as helping comparisons between respondents.
cheers,
Mathieu
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Sunday, May 9, 2010 1:20 pm
Subject: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
To: journal oekonux.org
Hi Mathieu!
5 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:
Here are my suggestions for the conference report questions.
May be I'm missing something but as far as I can see you didn't tell
us what you have in mind with such conference reports. In other mails
you were also talking of a extra section for this. Can you please
enlighten me on your thoughts? Who should be entitled to fill
out such
reports?
Grüße
Stefan
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal