Documenting current state (was: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports)

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 13:16:18 +0200

Hi Mathieu!

5 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:

ps. Though previously I did argue that having releases as issues would give more weight and visibility... see how we go...

And also because new people are asking questions: Wouldn't it make
sense to document the current state of discussion on the site in the
"Scientific Committee" area? I know you prefer the mailing list
archive for this but that is a bit unstructured - don't you think?


						Grüße

						Stefan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Documenting current state (was: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports)
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• References:
  • [jox] reviewing in practice
    • From: Athina Karatzogianni
  • Re: [jox] reviewing in practice
    • From: Maurizio Teli
  • Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: nathaniel tkacz
  • AW: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: Niesyto, Johanna
  • Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: nathaniel tkacz
  • Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: Documenting current state (was: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports)
• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
• First in thread: [jox] reviewing in practice
• Last in thread: [jox] Searchable mailing list archive (was: Re: Documenting current state)
• Previous thread: [jox] Fwd: CFP - Symposium on Peer Reviewing
• Next thread: [jox] Short site stop
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] HOWTO_conference reports
• Prev by Date: Plone accounts for new members (was: Re: [jox] Hott off the Editor's Desk)