Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions

• From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
• Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:49:22 +0200

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi all

@Nate: good point. 
The pain is that if we want to have footnotes at the bottom of each page in the PDF we might need to have two versions of the paper: one with normal footnotes in the PDF and one with square brackets (for example) that we will need to convert to html - though I admit I should first double-check how the CMS converts footnotes from docs. Having two versions means every modifications has to be done twice.

@Athina: If you want to have a look at the paper (alongside the original reviewers) once it is up you can see if you feel it needs to be cut a bit?

cheers,

Mathieu

ps. Sending using new version of mail software, hope it does not cause problems.


On 05/19/11, nathaniel tkacz  <nathanieltkacz gmail.com> wrote:

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
i think it would be good to have a html version as well as pdf. that way
people can link to articles as part of the cspp site, rather than as a stand
alone pdf article (because the html page will have links back to the
homepage etc). i think people are more likely to look at the rest of the
content that way. does that make sense? :)

Nate Tkacz

School of Culture and Communication
University of Melbourne

Twitter: http://twitter.com/__nate__

Research Page: http://nathanieltkacz.net

Current project: http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/about-2/


On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>wrote:

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi all

The question arises as to whether we should have research papers which can
be very long - Andersson on filesharing clocks in at 11,000 words - in html
and PDF formats or only as PDFs?

Also there is the question of the template for the PDF. At this stage I
don't really feel like experimenting too much so if someone has a clean and
simple doc template for journal articles I would really appreciate any
suggestions.

( Alessandro: the format for JCom seems OK to me, would it be possible to
get hold of a template or the specs? Many thanks.)

cheers,
Mathieu





[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

--
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php


[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
    • From: Christian Siefkes

• References:
  • [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
    • From: Johan Söderberg
  • Re: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
    • From: Michel Bauwens
  • [jox] Special issues
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Special issues
    • From: Maurizio Teli
  • [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
    • From: nathaniel tkacz

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
• First in thread: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
• Last in thread: Re: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
• Previous thread: [jox] First papers are up
• Next thread: [jox] Licence for articles
• Next by Date: [jox] First new SC members of 2011!
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions