Message 00583 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: joxT00565 Message: 18/38 L12 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] Hi all OK, well I think this could be resolved by a clear hierarchisation of available data for each research paper: - download article - download signals - download background information (original draft submission and reviewers reports) Would that be OK? cheers Mathieu ps. @StefanMn: I've been looking around to see if there was a way to measure webtraffic to the site but have not found anything so far. Do you know if there is an application that could do that? Thanks for advising. ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de> Date: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:19 am Subject: Re: [jox] Debrief and clarification process To: journal oekonux.org
Hi all! Yesterday Toni Prug wrote:i think this is critical point and deserves more attention andarguments. +1 I think openness in all stages is crucial for this project. I thought this would be clear... Grüße Stefan
**** Dr Mathieu O'Neil Adjunct Research Fellow Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute College of Arts and Social Science The Australian National University email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php [2 text/html] ______________________________ http://www.oekonux.org/journal
Thread: joxT00565 Message: 18/38 L12 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
---|---|---|---|
Message 00583 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |