Message 00583 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00565 Message: 18/38 L12 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] Debrief and clarification process



[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi all


OK, well I think this could be resolved by a clear hierarchisation of available data for each research paper:
- download article
- download signals
- download background information (original draft submission and reviewers reports)


Would that be OK?
cheers
Mathieu


ps. @StefanMn: I've been looking around to see if there was a way to measure webtraffic to the site but have not found anything so far. Do you know if there is an application that could do that? Thanks for advising.

----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:19 am
Subject: Re: [jox] Debrief and clarification process
To: journal oekonux.org

Hi all!

Yesterday Toni Prug wrote:
i think this is critical point and deserves more attention and 
arguments.
+1

I think openness in all stages is crucial for this project. I thought
this would be clear...


                                         Grüße

                                         Stefan

****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php





[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal



Thread: joxT00565 Message: 18/38 L12 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00583 [Homepage] [Navigation]