Message 00692 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00615 Message: 19/65 L13 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Dear Mathieu,

regarding your request for a 4,000 word contribution, I could write an
update to my basic CTheory essay, reflecting on some of the debates and
critiques it generated?


On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil>wrote:

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Journal report - 19 AUGUST 2011

Hi everyone, a number of issues for the journal project.
If you want to address a specific issue it might be best to start a new
thread to avoid confusion - thanks.


Johan suggested that we invite Jakob Rigi of the Central European
University in Budapest to join our SC, as he expressed a strong interest in
our journal and related work. I have subscribed Jakob to this list.

@Jakob: welcome aboard, please feel free to join in debates and get
involved as you see fit!



- ISSN number
- Inclusion in Google Scholar

It was suggested to me a couple of months ago that it would be useful to
obtain these things. If anyone knows how to do this quickly, or feels like
doing this, could you please let me know - thanks.



-Research papers section
3 papers submitted through the contact form on the website are at various
stage of being completed and reviewed.

-Reports/Reviews section
In the first issue we had two conference reports. This time I think it
would be good to have some book reviews. I could try to do one or two. If
anyone has any suggestions that would be good.

In particular if anyone has read Christian Fuch's latest book "Foundations
of Critical Media and Information Studies"? I have not read it but I think
it would be highly relevant to review it for CSPP.

Finally if someone is interested in being "Book review editor" that could a
good way to develop this - any takers?
We can start a new thread about this.

-Debate section
Nothing yet - see below for a suggestion.



From what I have heard from Johan and Alessandro they have had a ton of
submissions - well done.

@Johan and Alessandro: you can update the list periodically on how you are
going, if you like.



Mayo and I have been working on a CFP. I have been slack about this and
will focus on it now so we can release it soon.



Still waiting to hear from Maurizio and Vincenzo on how they want to
address the criticism by StefanMn that they are not properly addressing the
issue. So far StefanMz has expressed support for StefanMn. This is an edited
version of what I wrote on the issue on july 21:

"I understand what you say about peer production being a new phenomenon,
but I don't see how it can be separated from the 95% rest of the world
economy which is capitalistic. PP is both dependent on and enmeshed within
this wider order. For me the interesting thing scientifically is precisely
to work out the relationship between these two orders and - possibly from a
more activist perspective - to work out how to extend the commons and peer
production (...) if you want to get your point across effectively IMHO it
would be best to submit a paper to the journal for our upcoming issue on
peer production theory - that way you can explain what new tools and
concepts are needed etc. A whole issue on Oekonux can be envisaged for
later, we don't have the writing and editorial resources right now. The peer
production theory issue can be released next December. Is an article

Matthew Allen then agreed with this (sort of) see:



Perhaps a productive way to move this issue forward would be to articulate
the different positions in a formal "Debate" section which would appear in
the next issue, in December. There could be a statement by StefanMn and/or
StefanMz on why he/they think peer production transcends current analytical
categories and Maurizio and/or someone else could write a response.

This would have several advantages:
- There would be a Debate section in the next issue ;-)
- There would be a text by people in Oekonux in the journal
- There would be a clarification of how the FLOSS/peer production issue can
be approached



Our first issue had two research papers (including one by the editor...),
and the next "general/theory" one will have three. This is not a very high
number. Then with the upcoming special issues we should have more.

I thought a way around this would be to have a couple of "invited comments"
whereby we ask people who are knowledgeable about peer production to
articulate their understanding of it. These invited comments would not be
peer reviewed and would be around 4,000 words (?). They could be a remixed
version of a text published elsewhere. I got the idea from the Journal of
Science Communication which Alessandro edits which also has invited

For the general issue on peer production of CSPP here are some people who I
thought could be approached. Some are already involved in the journal:

-Christian Siefkes
Christian did an interesting piece on "commonism" in the recently published
okcon conference proceedings, which he has agreed to adapt for the next
issue of CSPP.

-Michel Bauwens

-Stefan Meretz

-Stefan Merten

@Michel, StefanMn, StefanMz - if there is a medium-sized text (around 4,000
words?) which summarises some of your main ideas regarding peer production
and the work you have been doing it could be useful for the P2P Foundation
and Oekonux projects. In my view as it would not be peer reviewed it doesn't
matter if it has been previously published in a different form.

Of course if StefanMn and/or StefanMz decide they want to do this instead
of start a "Debate" then that does not help the abovementioned Suggestion 1.
Ideally they could do both? The Debate paper does not have to be very long
(1,000-3,000 words).

-Finally there is a very stimulating French author, Jean Zin, who often
writes for EcoRev. I was thinking I could contact him and offer to translate
one of his texts.


Well, glad you made it to the end! ;-)
What does everyone think?


[2 text/html]

P2P Foundation:  -

Connect:; Discuss:


[2 text/html]


Thread: joxT00615 Message: 19/65 L13 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00692 [Homepage] [Navigation]