[Converted from multipart/mixed]
[1 text/plain]
Hi all,
Two questions on review procedure. Many apologies if I'm
missing something, I've checked on the site
but can't find procedrues for the following...
i. I assume that authors are openly known to reviewers and vice versa?
But then are reviewers also made publicly known?
ii. where/to whom do reviewers of papers submit their reviews
to?
much thanks
Lincoln
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-journal oekonux.org on behalf of Mathieu ONeil
Sent: Tue 01/06/2010 17:59
To: journal oekonux.org
Subject: Re: Opinion section (was: Re: [jox] Suggested Site Structure)
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi Stefan, all
I think the term "opinion" is perhaps taking us down the wrong
track: maybe "debate" is better. What that means is that while
traditional research papers can stand alone, the shorter more
polemic papers in the debate section would always feature two or
more clearly distinct / opposed views on a topic related to peer
production.
That is to say, there would always have to be at least two
authors involved in a submission to this format. So it would not
necessarily be a response to a previously published research
paper, it could be a new proposal. However if someone does want
to respond to a previously published research paper then that
paper could conceivably function as the first half of the debate
pair. What matters to me is providing the opportunity for well-
expressed disagreement on issues without necessarily having to
go the normal length of a research piece.
cheers,
Mathieu
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:47 pm
Subject: Opinion section (was: Re: [jox] Suggested Site Structure)
To: journal oekonux.org
Hi Mathieu and all!
5 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:
Regarding Stefan's final point below there is no intention
in
having unstructured debates in the opinion section but simply
these contributions would be 5 pages rather than 25 and most
importantly operate as responses to other well-articulated
positions or polemics rather than stand-alone papers. So
really
a lot more structured than the give and take of an email list
where some contributions could be a few lines. Hope this
explains a bit better the intention here...
So let's be clear here because this is very important to me: An
opinion always is a response to a published CSPP paper. Right?
Grüße
Stefan
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
[2 application/ms-tnef]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal