Re: [jox] Debrief and clarification process
- From: Athina Karatzogianni <athina.k gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:30:42 +0100
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi All,
On the question of encouraging the publication of drafts of submissions or
making such publication mandatory with possible exceptions, I would go with
encouraging not making it mandatory.
The authors can declare this when they submit in the first instance whether
they want it published or not.
Cheers
Athina
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Simon Lindgren
<simon.lindgren soc.umu.se>wrote:
OK, well I think this could be resolved by a clear hierarchisation of
available data for each research paper:
- download article
- download signals
- download background information (original draft submission and reviewers
reports)
this seems like a very good solution
simon
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
--
<http://www.routledge.com/books/search/keywords/karatzogianni/>
Dr Athina Karatzogianni<http://www2.hull.ac.uk/FASS/humanities/media,_culture_and_society/staff/karatzogianni,_dr_athina.aspx>
Lecturer in Media, Culture and Society
The Dean's Representative (Chinese Partnerships)
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
The University of Hull
United Kingdom
HU6 7RX
T: ++44 (0) 1482 46 5790
F: ++44 (0) 1482 466107
E: a.karatzogianni hull.ac.uk
Check out Athina's
work<http://www.routledge.com/books/search/keywords/karatzogianni/>
https://sites.google.com/site/athinak/
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal