Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)

• From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
• Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:19:38 +0200

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi Stefan

Apologies for mixup and delay: some reviewers are quicker than others, I get distracted, and I was also hoping to get some feedback from the list on how to get the peer process going. I have been rereading the sub and reviews and will be forwarding them to you shortly.

cheers

Mathieu


----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Date: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:46 pm
Subject: Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
To: journal oekonux.org

Hi Mathieu!

6 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:

a) The three reviews for the Meretz and Merten submission are 

in. Apart from anything else, it has belatedly occurred to me 
that this piece is technically too short (3,500 words) to 
feature in the research section where articles are meant to be 6-
8,000 words!??...

The text is the first chapter of a longer text consisting of four
chapters. I said this when I submitted the piece and you also asked
back because of this before.

There is no problem to add another chapter or two or three. I'd
welcome if this topic could be settled after half a year of
submission.


                                        	Grüße

                                        	Stefan

****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php





[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• Follow-Ups:
  • [jox] Peer process (was: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text)
    • From: Stefan Merten

• References:
  • [jox] open peer review
    • From: graham
  • [jox] Journal update
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
    • From: Stefan Merten

• Next in thread: [jox] Peer process (was: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text)
• Previous in thread: Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
• First in thread: [jox] open peer review
• Last in thread: [jox] Re: Making pieces visible
• Previous thread: [jox] elsevier
• Next thread: [jox] Logo
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] Logo
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Logo