[jox] Peer process (was: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text)

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:59:16 +0200

Hi Mathieu!

6 days ago Mathieu ONeil wrote:

I was also hoping to get some feedback from the list on how to get the peer process going.

Well, my main problem is that it is not written down somewhere in a
concise form. Graham noted that he has the same problem. I think we
had a consensus on how to proceed so this is what is missing.

You said that you like to keep this stuff in the mailing list archive.
Well, to me it looks like this policy is one of the big obstacles at
the moment. I'd like to recommend that you change your mind on this.


						Grüße

						Stefan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jox] Peer process (was: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text)
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• References:
  • [jox] open peer review
    • From: graham
  • [jox] Journal update
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] Peer process (was: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text)
• Previous in thread: Re: Size of Merten / Meretz text (was: [jox] Journal update)
• First in thread: [jox] open peer review
• Last in thread: [jox] Re: Making pieces visible
• Previous thread: [jox] elsevier
• Next thread: [jox] Logo
• Next by Date: [jox] Re: Making pieces visible
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Logo