Message 00606 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: joxT00565 Message: 31/38 L20 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] hmm... it seems weird that this was settled so quickly. two things: 1) i think it is ok to have publishing drafts as the default option. however, i don't like the idea of asking people who opt out to provide a rationale. this kind of goes against the whole point of opting out. 2) @mathieu - although it's a response to amy's concerns, the line you incorporated in the review process section about not being harsh when submitting draft look a bit out of place. it's too idiosyncratic in relation to the other material. amy does however raise an interesting and important point, which invites us to think about what making things visible means and about how we might need to highlight certain things with contributors. maybe we should make a 'things to consider before submitting your draft' list that covers these kinds of things. i'm sure more will emerge as we go. best Nate Tkacz School of Culture and Communication University of Melbourne Twitter: http://twitter.com/__nate__ Research Page: http://nathanieltkacz.net Current project: http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/about-2/ On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de> wrote:
Hi all! 24 minutes ago Alex Halavais wrote:My concern with making it optional is that most people won't. The default is to do what you are familiar and comfortable with. I'll admit that despite my push for making this the requirement, I myself would--if given the option--be unlikely to open my draft up. I'd still publish it on my site or something, probably, but why would I take a risk when others will not.I think it's a cultural question. The same goes for software: Not every software is written well and of high quality. It may work but for some pieces if you look at the sources... Still today in Free Software there is a culture of publishing everything - good or bad. That culture needs encouraging. For Free Software it's mandatory. And people with bad software also risk their next job - still it's published. Though there are certainly differences may be we can learn from this example. Grüße Stefan
[2 text/html] ______________________________ http://www.oekonux.org/journal
Thread: joxT00565 Message: 31/38 L20 | [In date index] | [In thread index] | |
---|---|---|---|
Message 00606 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |