By thread

Thread Index Page 15/21 [Homepage] [Navigation]
300/6123 messages [Date Index]
New <= 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 => Old
  • Re: [ox-en] Software development is an ecosystem (was: the Deleuzian engineer), (continued)
    • oxen T01703 [ox-en] debian [OT] Graham Seaman, 10/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] debian [OT]
      L1, Benni Baermann, 10/12/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] debian [OT]
        L2, Graham Seaman, 10/12/2003
        1. Re: [ox-en] debian [OT]
          L3, Rich Walker, 10/12/2003
          1. Re: [ox-en] debian [OT]
            L4, Graham Seaman, 10/12/2003
    oxen T01679 [ox-en] "We Seize!" intermediate report - Tuesday Stefan Merten, 09/12/2003
    1. [ox-en] Re: "We Seize!" intermediate report - Tuesday
      L1, Stefan Merten, 09/12/2003
    oxen T01673 [ox-en] Report from "We Seize!" - Monday Stefan Merten, 08/12/2003
    oxen T01634 [ox-en] A piece of free hardware ;-) benni, 06/12/2003
    oxen T01624 [ox-en] Peace on earth Patrick Anderson, 06/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Peace on earth
      L1, Niall Douglas, 06/12/2003
    2. About scarcity, property, and land (was: Re: [ox-en] Peace on earth)
      L1, Stefan Merten, 24/01/2004
      1. [ox-en] Re: About scarcity, property, and land
        L2, Benja Fallenstein, 24/01/2004
        1. Re: [ox-en] Re: About scarcity, property, and land
          L3, Stefan Merten, 24/01/2004
    oxen T01623 Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux helvetius, 05/12/2003
    1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
      L1, Niall Douglas, 05/12/2003
      1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
        L2, Martin Hardie, 06/12/2003
        1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Paul Bowman, 06/12/2003
        2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Niall Douglas, 07/12/2003
          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Russell McOrmond, 07/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Niall Douglas, 07/12/2003
              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, Benj. Mako Hill, 07/12/2003
                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                  L7, Niall Douglas, 08/12/2003
                  1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                    L8, Martin Hardie, 08/12/2003
                    1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                      L9, Niall Douglas, 08/12/2003
              2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, Russell McOrmond, 07/12/2003
                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                  L7, august, 07/12/2003
                2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                  L7, Niall Douglas, 08/12/2003
                  1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                    L8, Martin Hardie, 08/12/2003
                    1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                      L9, august, 08/12/2003
                      1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                        L10, Martin Hardie, 08/12/2003
                      2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                        L10, Niall Douglas, 08/12/2003
                        1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                          L11, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                            L12, august, 09/12/2003
                            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                            2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Niall Douglas, 09/12/2003
                              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Rich Walker, 12/12/2003
                                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Niall Douglas, 12/12/2003
                        2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                          L11, Raj Mathur, 09/12/2003
                          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                            L12, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Raj Mathur, 09/12/2003
                              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                            2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                              2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                              3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                              4. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, august, 09/12/2003
                                  1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L16, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Graham Seaman, 09/12/2003
                                  1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L16, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                  2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L17, Graham Seaman, 09/12/2003
                                  3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L17, Rich Walker, 09/12/2003
                                  4. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L18, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                  5. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L18, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                  6. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L19, Graham Seaman, 09/12/2003
                                  7. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L19, Benj. Mako Hill, 10/12/2003
                                  8. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L20, auskadi, 10/12/2003
                                  9. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L20, auskadi, 10/12/2003
                                  10. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L16, Raj Mathur, 09/12/2003
                                3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                            3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                          2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                            L12, Niall Douglas, 09/12/2003
                        3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                          L11, Rich Walker, 12/12/2003
                      3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                        L10, Benj. Mako Hill, 08/12/2003
                        1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                          L11, august, 08/12/2003
                          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                            L12, Martin Hardie, 08/12/2003
                            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                              L13, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Martin Hardie, 09/12/2003
                                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                                  1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L16, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                                  2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L17, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                                  3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L17, Patrick Anderson, 09/12/2003
                                  4. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L18, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                                  5. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                    L19, Patrick Anderson, 09/12/2003
                              2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, august, 09/12/2003
                                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Graham Seaman, 09/12/2003
                                2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                              3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                L14, Russell McOrmond, 09/12/2003
                                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                                  L15, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
                                  1. [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
                                    L16, Martin Hardie, 15/12/2003
                                  2. Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
                                    L17, Graham Seaman, 15/12/2003
                                  3. [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
                                    L18, auskadi, 15/12/2003
                                  4. Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
                                    L18, Benj. Mako Hill, 15/12/2003
                                  5. Re: [ox-en] Re: RFC's, the jargon entry - Law and Rule
                                    L19, Rich Walker, 23/12/2003
                      4. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                        L10, Paul Bowman, 09/12/2003
                  2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                    L8, Benj. Mako Hill, 08/12/2003
                    1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                      L9, Niall Douglas, 09/12/2003
            2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Martin Hardie, 07/12/2003
              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, Russell McOrmond, 08/12/2003
          2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Raj Mathur, 07/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Martin Hardie, 07/12/2003
            2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Niall Douglas, 08/12/2003
          3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Benj. Mako Hill, 07/12/2003
      2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
        L2, Benni Baermann, 06/12/2003
        1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Martin Hardie, 06/12/2003
          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Paul Bowman, 06/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Martin Hardie, 07/12/2003
          2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Benj. Mako Hill, 07/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Graham Seaman, 07/12/2003
              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, august, 07/12/2003
              2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, Russell McOrmond, 08/12/2003
                1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                  L7, tOM Trottier, 08/12/2003
                2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                  L7, Benj. Mako Hill, 09/12/2003
          3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller, 08/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Martin Hardie, 08/12/2003
            2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Benj. Mako Hill, 08/12/2003
              1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
                L6, Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller, 11/12/2003
        2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Benj. Mako Hill, 06/12/2003
        3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Paul Bowman, 06/12/2003
          1. [ox-en] errata
            L4, Paul Bowman, 06/12/2003
        4. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Niall Douglas, 07/12/2003
    2. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
      L1, Benj. Mako Hill, 06/12/2003
      3. Subject based follow-up(s):
    3. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
      L1, Niall Douglas, 10/12/2003
      1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
        L2, Russell McOrmond, 10/12/2003
        1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Niall Douglas, 10/12/2003
          1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Russell McOrmond, 11/12/2003
            1. Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
              L5, Martin Hardie, 11/12/2003
            2. Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
              L5, Niall Douglas, 11/12/2003
              1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                L6, Casimir Purzelbaum, 12/12/2003
                1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                  L7, Niall Douglas, 12/12/2003
                  1. [ox-en] Re: Software as society
                    L8, Rich Walker, 12/12/2003
                    1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society
                      L9, Niall Douglas, 12/12/2003
                  2. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                    L8, Casimir Purzelbaum, 12/12/2003
                    1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                      L9, Niall Douglas, 13/12/2003
                      1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                        L10, Casimir Purzelbaum, 15/12/2003
                        1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                          L11, Niall Douglas, 15/12/2003
                  3. [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                    L8, Seth Johnson, 14/12/2003
                    1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                      L9, Martin Hardie, 14/12/2003
                      1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                        L10, Seth Johnson, 14/12/2003
                    2. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                      L9, Niall Douglas, 14/12/2003
                      1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                        L10, Seth Johnson, 14/12/2003
                        1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standardswas Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                          L11, Seth Johnson, 15/12/2003
              2. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                L6, Rich Walker, 12/12/2003
                1. [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                  L7, Per I. Mathisen, 12/12/2003
                  1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                    L8, Rich Walker, 12/12/2003
                  2. Re: [ox-en] Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                    L8, Niall Douglas, 12/12/2003
              3. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                L6, Benj. Mako Hill, 13/12/2003
                1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                  L7, Martin Hardie, 14/12/2003
                  1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                    L8, Benj. Mako Hill, 14/12/2003
              4. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                L6, Benj. Mako Hill, 14/12/2003
                1. Re: Software as society (was: Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux)
                  L7, Niall Douglas, 14/12/2003
        2. Re: [politics] Re: Documentation Standards was Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, tOM Trottier, 11/12/2003
    oxen T01617 [ox-en] Free as in America Martin Hardie, 05/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Free as in America
      L1, cc, 05/12/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Free as in America
        L2, Martin Hardie, 05/12/2003
    oxen T01615 [ox-en] UserLinux Benni Baermann, 04/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
      L1, Graham Seaman, 04/12/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
        L2, Benj. Mako Hill, 05/12/2003
        1. Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
          L3, Graham Seaman, 05/12/2003
          1. Re: [ox-en] UserLinux
            L4, Benj. Mako Hill, 05/12/2003
    oxen T01613 [ox-en] Re: Selbstentfaltung= "self organized group"? Stefan Meretz, 03/12/2003
    oxen T01608 [ox-en] Oekonux besides WSIS Stefan Merten, 01/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Oekonux besides WSIS
      L1, Benj. Mako Hill, 02/12/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Oekonux besides WSIS
        L2, Chris, 02/12/2003
      2. Oekonux dinner during WSIS (was: Re: [ox-en] Oekonux besides WSIS)
        L2, Stefan Merten, 03/12/2003
    oxen T01605 [ox-en] another journalistic work to be supported! Franz Nahrada, 01/12/2003
    1. [ox-en] Re: [ox] another journalistic work to be supported!
      L1, Graham Seaman, 01/12/2003
    oxen T01607 [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society Niall Douglas, 01/12/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society
      L1, johan soderberg, 02/12/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society
        L2, Niall Douglas, 03/12/2003
    2. Re: [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society
      L1, Stefan Merten, 19/01/2004
      1. the Meteors WAS Re: [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society
        L2, Adam Moran, 20/01/2004
      2. Re: [ox-en] Some thoughts upon the GPL society
        L2, Niall Douglas, 21/01/2004
      3. Re: [ox-en] Teleology WAS Some thoughts upon the GPL society
        L2, Adam Moran, 23/01/2004
    oxen T01603 [ox-en] drugref.org Graham Seaman, 30/11/2003
    1. [ox-en] networks, art & collaboration (buffalo, april 2004)
      L1, geert lovink, 01/12/2003
    2. Re: [ox-en] drugref.org
      L1, Stefan Merten, 17/01/2004
    oxen T01601 [ox-en] 3. Oekonux Conference: Call for Contribution Stefan Merten, 28/11/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] 3. Oekonux Conference: Call for Contribution
      L1, Stefan Merten, 29/11/2003
    oxen T01600 [ox-en] [hipatia] hipatia en el Politecnico de Torino (fwd) Graham Seaman, 27/11/2003
    oxen T01593 [ox-en] FLOSS in Asia benni, 17/11/2003
    oxen T01588 [ox-en] New planing document for 3. Oekonux conference Stefan Merten, 16/11/2003
    1. [ox-en] Now: Planning (was: Re: New planing document for 3. Oekonux conference)
      L1, Stefan Merten, 17/11/2003
    oxen T01567 [ox-en] The GnuLabour Party Paul Bowman, 12/11/2003
    oxen T01565 [ox-en] recommendation to Brazilian WSIS delegates Graham Seaman, 11/11/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] recommendation to Brazilian WSIS delegates
      L1, Martin Hardie, 11/11/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] recommendation to Brazilian WSIS delegates
        L2, Chris Croome, 17/11/2003
    2. Re: [ox-en] Any feedback ? FROM recommendation to Brazilian WSIS delegates
      L1, Adam Moran, 14/01/2004
      1. Re: [ox-en] Any feedback ? FROM recommendation to Brazilian WSIS delegates
        L2, Graham Seaman, 15/01/2004
    oxen T01563 [ox-en] Products replacing services Stefan Merten, 10/11/2003
    oxen T01561 [ox-en] China to invest heavily in Linux geert lovink, 09/11/2003
    oxen T01560 [ox-en] European Commission publishes "Open Source Migration Guidelines" Stefan Merten, 08/11/2003
    oxen T01543 [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell Chris Croome, 04/11/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
      L1, Benni Baermann, 05/11/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
        L2, Chris Croome, 05/11/2003
        1. Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
          L3, Martin Hardie, 06/11/2003
          1. Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
            L4, Graham Seaman, 06/11/2003
            1. [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
              L5, Russell McOrmond, 07/11/2003
              1. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                L6, Graham Seaman, 07/11/2003
                1. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                  L7, Martin Hardie, 07/11/2003
                2. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                  L7, Russell McOrmond, 07/11/2003
              2. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                L6, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/11/2003
                1. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                  L7, Russell McOrmond, 13/11/2003
                  1. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about Trademarks?
                    L8, Benj. Mako Hill, 13/11/2003
            2. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about other Exclusive Property Rights/Trademarks? (Was: RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell)
              L5, Martin Hardie, 07/11/2003
              1. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about other Exclusive Property Rights/Trademarks? (Was: RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell)
                L6, Graham Seaman, 07/11/2003
                1. Debian vs 'commercial' distrobutions, was: Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about other Exclusive Property Rights/Trademarks? (Was: RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell)
                  L7, Chris Croome, 07/11/2003
                2. Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about other Exclusive Property Rights/Trademarks?
                  L7, Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller, 09/11/2003
              2. Identity as an OHA aspect (was: Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copyright, but what about other Exclusive Property Rights/Trademarks?)
                L6, Stefan Merten, 16/01/2004
                1. Re: Identity as an OHA aspect (was: Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copy...)
                  L7, Casimir Purzelbaum, 17/01/2004
                  1. Re: Identity as an OHA aspect (was: Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copy...)
                    L8, Niall Douglas, 17/01/2004
                    1. Re: Identity as an OHA aspect (was: Re: [ox-en] Patents and Copy...)
                      L9, Casimir Purzelbaum, 18/01/2004
                  2. [ox-en] Re: Identity as an OHA aspect
                    L8, Stefan Merten, 07/02/2004
                    1. Re: [ox-en] Re: Identity as an OHA aspect
                      L9, Casimir Purzelbaum, 07/02/2004
          2. Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
            L4, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/11/2003
            1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive was - RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
              L5, Martin Hardie, 13/11/2003
              1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive was - RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
                L6, Benj. Mako Hill, 13/11/2003
                1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive
                  L7, Martin Hardie, 13/11/2003
                  1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive
                    L8, Graham Seaman, 13/11/2003
                    1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                      L9, Martin Hardie, 14/11/2003
                      1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                        L10, Graham Seaman, 14/11/2003
                        1. [ox-en] Re: GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                          L11, auskadi, 14/11/2003
                      2. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                        L10, cc, 15/11/2003
                        1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                          L11, Martin Hardie, 15/11/2003
                          1. Privatisation of FLOSS? was: Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                            L12, CC, 16/11/2003
                          2. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                            L12, Russell McOrmond, 17/11/2003
                            1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                              L13, Martin Hardie, 17/11/2003
                            2. [ox-en] Re: Open is Good Closed is Bad ....
                              L13, Martin Hardie, 22/11/2003
                        2. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                          L11, Benj. Mako Hill, 24/11/2003
                          1. Neither pro nor anti but trans! (was: Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of))
                            L12, Stefan Merten, 16/01/2004
                            1. it's post-capitalist! was: Re: Neither pro nor anti but trans! (was: Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of))
                              L13, cc, 17/01/2004
                              1. Re: it's post-capitalist! was: Re: Neither pro nor anti but trans! (was: Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of))
                                L14, Benj. Mako Hill, 25/01/2004
                                1. [ox-en] Re: it's post-capitalist!
                                  L15, Art McGee, 27/01/2004
                                  1. Re: [ox-en] Re: it's post-capitalist!
                                    L16, Stefan Meretz, 28/01/2004
                            2. [ox-en] Species Differentia? WAS Re: Neither pro nor anti but trans!
                              L13, Adam Moran, 29/01/2004
                      3. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                        L10, Seth Johnson, 15/11/2003
                      4. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive (and all the rest of those threads that this grew out of)
                        L10, Russell McOrmond, 17/11/2003
                  2. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive And Primacy of Contract
                    L8, Adam Moran, 14/11/2003
                    1. [ox-en] Re: GPL Restrictive And Primacy of Contract
                      L9, auskadi, 14/11/2003
              2. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive was - RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
                L6, Russell McOrmond, 13/11/2003
                1. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive was - RedHat and Fedora and SuSE andNovell
                  L7, Seth Johnson, 14/11/2003
              3. Re: [ox-en] GPL Restrictive was - RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
                L6, Seth Johnson, 15/11/2003
    oxen T01541 [ox-en] Wellcome Trust about free access to scientific results Stefan Merten, 03/11/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Wellcome Trust about free access to scientific results
      L1, Graham Seaman, 03/11/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Wellcome Trust about free access to scientific results
        L2, Stefan Merten, 14/01/2004
        1. Re: [ox-en] Wellcome Trust about free access to scientific results
          L3, Graham Seaman, 14/01/2004
    oxen T01536 [ox-en] Re: [prep-l] The term "intellectual property" Seth Johnson, 01/11/2003
    1. [ox-en] Re: [prep-l] The term "intellectual property"
      L1, Martin Hardie, 01/11/2003
      1. [ox-en] Re: [prep-l] The term "intellectual property"
        L2, Seth Johnson, 01/11/2003
        1. [ox-en] Re: [prep-l] The term "intellectual property"
          L3, Martin Hardie, 01/11/2003
    oxen T01533 [ox-en] Fwd: Inviting you to participate in PISTA 2004 Stefan Merten, 31/10/2003
    oxen T01530 [ox-en] The term "intellectual property" Chris Croome, 30/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
      L1, João Miguel Neves, 30/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
        L2, august, 30/10/2003
        1. Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
          L3, Stefan Merten, 14/01/2004
    2. Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
      L1, Graham Seaman, 31/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
        L2, Martin Hardie, 01/11/2003
    3. Theft WAS Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
      L1, Adam Moran, 07/11/2003
      1. Re: Theft WAS Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
        L2, Graham Seaman, 07/11/2003
        1. Re: Theft WAS Re: [ox-en] The term "intellectual property"
          L3, Adam Moran, 07/11/2003
    oxen T01522 [ox-en] Re: [ox] krisen text (fwd) Graham Seaman, 27/10/2003
    oxen T01520 [ox-en] Re: [ox] Fwd: Werthaltigkeit von Informationsguetern Graham Seaman, 26/10/2003
    1. [ox-en] Manufacturing scarcity (was: Re: [ox] Fwd: Werthaltigkeit von Informationsguetern)
      L1, Stefan Merten, 02/11/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Manufacturing scarcity (was: Re: [ox] Fwd: Werthaltigkeit von Informationsguetern)
        L2, Rich Walker, 11/11/2003
    oxen T01512 [ox-en] participatory research (was: the role of science and universities) Thomas Berker, 25/10/2003
    oxen T01509 [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts. Martin Hardie, 24/10/2003
    1. [ox-en] Re: [AFLUG] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
      L1, ken, 24/10/2003
    2. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
      L1, Felix Stalder, 26/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
        L2, Martin Hardie, 27/10/2003
        1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
          L3, Felix Stalder, 27/10/2003
          1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
            L4, Martin Hardie, 27/10/2003
        2. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
          L3, Russell McOrmond, 27/10/2003
          1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
            L4, Martin Hardie, 27/10/2003
          2. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
            L4, Martin Hardie, 28/10/2003
            1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
              L5, Russell McOrmond, 28/10/2003
              1. Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
                L6, Graham Seaman, 04/11/2003
    oxen T01501 [ox-en] Berlin Declaration on Open Access Thomas Berker, 22/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Berlin Declaration on Open Access
      L1, Graham Seaman, 23/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox] Re: [ox-en] Berlin Declaration on Open Access
        L2, Graham Seaman, 23/10/2003
      2. Re: [ox-en] Berlin Declaration on Open Access
        L2, Thomas Berker, 24/10/2003
    oxen T01496 [ox-en] Georg Greve on Free Software Stefan Merten, 21/10/2003
    oxen T01495 [ox-en] Hello all Martin Olivera, 21/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Hello all
      L1, Graham Seaman, 22/10/2003
    2. Re:Hello Martin AND The Hipatia Manifesto WAS [ox-en] Hello all
      L1, Adam Moran, 22/10/2003
    3. Oekonux-Hipatia manifesto (was: Re: [ox-en] Hello all)
      L1, Stefan Merten, 30/12/2003
    oxen T01491 [ox-en] [INFO] - Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm Adam Moran, 21/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] [INFO] - Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm
      L1, Chris Croome, 21/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] [INFO] - Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm
        L2, Alan, 21/10/2003
    oxen T01480 [ox-en] Call for Contribution -- Draft Stefan Merten, 20/10/2003
    oxen T01457 [ox-en] is free software 'disruptive' geert lovink, 17/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] is free software 'disruptive'
      L1, Russell McOrmond, 17/10/2003
    oxen T01455 [ox-en] Google directory entry on Open Source Hardware Stefan Merten, 16/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Google directory entry on Open Source Hardware
      L1, Stefan Meretz, 26/10/2003
      1. Re: [ox-en] Google directory entry on Open Source Hardware
        L2, Stefan Merten, 14/01/2004
    oxen T01454 [ox-en] Discussion in Kuro5hin Stefan Merten, 16/10/2003
    1. Re: [ox-en] Discussion in Kuro5hin
      L1, Chris Croome, 16/10/2003
    oxen T01449 [ox-en] Wired Magazine : Open Source Everywhere Chris Croome, 16/10/2003
    New <= 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 => Old
    300/6123 messages [Date Index]
    Thread Index Page 15/21 [Homepage] [Navigation]
    Mail converted by MHonArc